Dr Christopher Monk explores Anglo-Saxon characters and reads from a selection of Old English from the Textus Roffensis: King Æthelberht’s Code from the turn of the seventh century, Alfred’s Domboc (‘Book of Laws’) from the late ninth century, and a charm for stolen livestock possibly from the late tenth to the early eleventh century.

Dr Christopher Monk takes a look at the 'Saxon Characters' Elstob left behind in the cathedral's manuscript, Textus Roffensis. Open folio in new tab.

folio 1r King Æthelberht’s Code circa 600 CE

This text is the only surviving copy of the oldest piece of written Old English and is also the oldest English law code. Find out more

11r King Alfred’s Domboc (‘Book of Laws’) after 893 CE

This portion of the text contains the opening verse of Exodus 20. Find out more

95r Charm for stolen livestock, possibly late-10th- to early-11th-century

The copying of a charm, or incantation, into a collection of laws may seem quite strange. However, this particular charm relates to the crime of theft, so the compiler of Textus Roffensis may have thought it appropriate to include it. Its mixture of magic ritual and Christian language suggests that the Pagan heritage of the early English peoples had survived hundreds of years. Find out more

I have, since 2017, been releasing translations of Old English and Latin documents from Textus Roffensis; these are now available on the Cathedral website. The aim of this ongoing project is to translate the whole of the manuscript, and also to give historical context to its many documents through various notes, articles and videos.

Challenges in translation

Making medieval manuscripts, including Textus Roffensis, accessible to a modern, general audience is not without its challenges. So much is unfamiliar: the script or handwriting, the layout of a text, the archaic terminology, to mention just three things.

When translating Old English and medieval Latin, I like to produce quite literal translations that are nevertheless understandable. I want as much of the text as possible to make immediate sense to modern readers – of all ages – but at the same time to echo at least some of the medieval idiom or feel of the language.

This does mean, in practice, that certain words or turns of phrase that crop up in my translations will be somewhat, or even downright, obscure. Fairly frequently, especially in the case of Old English laws, there will actually be words that cannot be translated; their use and meaning are so of the time that a note has to be given to suggest an interpretation.

With the royal charters of Textus Roffensis, the Latin is on occasion excruciatingly long-winded and flowery – just check out Æthelred’s grant to restore lands at Wouldham and Littlebrook to the Rochester church, if you want to get an idea of what I mean. Even so, the hope is that readers will in effect hear the medieval voices at play, and the core intent of the document will still be apparent.

Representing the original text

Included with each translation there is a transcription-come-edition of the original language text, representing in a modern font how it appears in the manuscript. 

My emphasis for these transcriptions is on accessibility rather than academic convention. For example, it is indicated where the scribe’s abbreviations are expanded (shown by italics) rather than silently expanding them, as a modern editor might do.

Also, the different colours of ink in the manuscript are represented, most obviously the red of rubrics, or headings, but you’ll also see green and purple-blue letters.

Non-experts should then be able to look at the digitised folio of the manuscript and compare it directly to the corresponding transcript, and follow along, should they wish to.

The layout of the transcript approximates the arrangement of words on the manuscript page. For example, a word that is split over two lines in the manuscript is hyphenated in the transcript to show it is actually a single word. However, the division of words has been modernised, in line with current editorial practice. This helps readers to properly identify individual words; this is especially helpful with Old English, where word division can seem almost haphazard at times.

The punctuation mark known as punctus (it looks like our full-stop) has been converted to a comma wherever appropriate.

Notes are provided on the most visible of scribal alterations and insertions, for example, where a letter or word has been inserted above the line or a section of text, which the scribe had failed to copy, has been appended in a margin. However, I have passed over without note those corrections that only a very keen eye would spot, such as where the scribe has written a letter over another that he’s carefully scraped away.

The special characters of Old English have been largely kept. So the letters ash æ, eth ð, and thorn þ (and their upper-case equivalents Æ, Ð, and Þ) have all been preserved. However, the letter w has been substituted for the Old English letter wynn ƿ, thus avoiding confusion with the letter p; this is commonly done in modern editions of Old English texts. Also preserved is the Old English sign for the and abbreviation; this is represented by 7 (equivalent to modern &). The Latin letter ȩ (known as the tailed e) is also kept.

I do hope that as many people as possible will read the translations of the documents found in this incredible manuscript, Textus Roffensis. Mine are not the only translations of these texts, though in many cases the translations are, as far as I’m aware, the only ones to exist or are the first to be published, or, perhaps more pertinently, more readily accessible than some of the older or incomplete translations that have been published in the past.

Dr Christopher Monk

themedievalmonk.com

Christopher Monk is a cultural historian and manuscript specialist working with heritage professionals as well as individuals and teams in the creative industries. He specialises in the Middle Ages, with a strong focus on early medieval English texts and artwork. He has worked with Rochester Cathedral since 2013, contributing to its multimedia content on Textus Roffensis.